Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Baradello


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:35, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Carlos Baradello

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article for professional speaker. No evidence of meeting notability as WP:PROF or theGNG--the refs are either notices or pr, or non-independent.  DGG ( talk ) 22:55, 8 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Promotional or vanity page. Also has all the hallmarks of a commissioned work. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:15, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, I personally see no significant notability, nor see any sense of statements or refs that could prove notability. In addition, there seems to be a heavy sense that the article is of a promotional nature. - Navarre0107 (talk) 02:53, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, apparently non-notable – seems to have published one article, which has been cited 5 times, and thus to have an h-index of 1. And yes, it certainly looks very much like paid work;, were you hired to create this page? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:12, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: Hi all. Same old story - apparently I'm still struggling to find the right balance between wanting to create new articles for people in alumni / faculty environments that I find interesting and think might pass as notable - and them actually doing so. In this case I judged that Baradello wouldn't pass academic notability, after looking at his h-index, but thought that the Spanish sources (esp. this one in El Diario, this and this might suffice and had enough to allow for an article. Especially since the first one was a full cover and not just some trivial mention. But maybe it's too regional? He seems to be a voice in the sector of innovation and I tried to keep the article very neutral. But probably was still influenced by Speaker.com and others. Since most of you are much more experienced than I am - as per usual I bow to the majority vote... just wish I got this figured out faster so I don't always invest so much work :P Should I do this in the sandbox in the future and ask for feedback first? Is there anything else I can do better to make sure they actually pass? Feedback appreciated -- Ruhri Jörg  14:36, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * P.S.: The three mentioned sources seemed to me to be neither notices, pr nor non-independend am I wrong? -- Ruhri  Jörg  14:44, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:16, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:16, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Although the numbers suggest a "delete" consensus, i would like time given to assess Ruhri Jörg's sources.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 21:59, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:51, 17 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete, no indication of person ever doing anything notable. Abductive  (reasoning) 07:44, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing to see here (fails WP:GNG). Xxanthippe (talk) 10:22, 18 September 2019 (UTC).
 * Delete. Fails Notability (academics) and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 11:51, 23 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.