Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Damas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 01:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Carlos Damas

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article was originally speedy deleted as G11. It was then recreated and most recently was dePRODed by an anon-IP editor. The article still suffers from overly promotional tone, and does not establish notability per WP:NMUSIC. The cites provided are not strong reliable sources and the only claim of notability I am able to locate is that he was honoured by ARTEtv. I am unable to locate reliable sources to verify that claim though. But I may be having difficulty finding sources because I do not speak Portuguese, and am happy to withdraw the nomination if someone can turn up significant reliable source coverage to establish notability. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 16:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 21:02, 31 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 6 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of notable coverage. Aside from MySpace, Facebook, official website, YouTube and iTunes links, I didn't find anything notable on both Google and Yahoo! searches. SwisterTwister   talk  22:12, 6 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:RS and WP:INDY. Existing sources seem too "glowing" to be reliably independent.  Also concerned per WP:COI, since the article appears to have been written by a WP:SPA.   Rich wales (talk · contribs) 03:25, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.