Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos E. Stolk III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  Hut 8.5  20:35, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Carlos E. Stolk III

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a biography (perhaps an autobiography) of a person who has not achieved encyclopedic notability. Sources are either Wikipedia, IMDB, a HuffingtonPost contributor and a blog, none of which would we consider reliable, in-depth and independent. When I first came across this article a few days ago, I placed a few citation-needed tags on it. But despite a goodly number of edits since then, the only new sourcing has been some directory listings. Most recently, I've been in a small edit war with an IP address over whether the article should contain the name of a non-notable child. I recognize that this in itself is not a good reason for deletion, but it did cause me to change my mind about waiting longer before nominating here. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:16, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Additional note : A draft on the same subject was deleted via MfD at WP:Miscellany_for_deletion/Draft:Carlos_E_Stolk_III. Another draft Draft:Carlos Eduardo Stolk III exists and has been twice declined at AfC. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:29, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Another note : Just learned that it had been speedy-deleted under yet another version of the name. See WP:Articles for deletion/Carlos E. Stolk, III NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:10, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:17, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 17:17, 27 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, no notability; fails WP:GNG. A promo, puff piece. Kierzek (talk) 17:39, 27 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, need 24-48 hours to get citations needed, 27 March 2018 (UTC), IF THIS PAGE IS DELETED THE UNITED NATIONS WILL BE INVOLVED IN GETTING IT RE POSTED* — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:581:C000:34F7:D900:904A:9C8C:F704 (talk)
 * Delete - This clearly is someone who is trying to create a promo page. Fails WP:GNG as well. As for the comment about the United Nations above...umm...not appropriate for this venue and has no bearing on our decisions. --  Dane talk  02:50, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, need 24-48 hours to get citations needed, 27 March 2018 (UTC), IF THIS PAGE IS DELETED THE UNITED NATIONS WILL BE INVOLVED IN GETTING IT RE POSTED* — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:581:C000:34F7:D900:904A:9C8C:F704 (talk)   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klots888 (talk • contribs)
 * Struck duplicate !vote. --  Dane talk  19:57, 29 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, This person has encyclopaedic relevance. Please allow some time to retrieve the citations from Spanish publications, 30 March 2018. — KLOTSNET (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Struck another sock !vote --  Dane talk  01:12, 1 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, PLEASE ALLOW THE SPANISH COMMUNITY TO GET THE SOURCES NEEDED FOR THE CITATIONS FOR CARLOS EDUARDO STOLK III / 30 March, 2018,
 * Struck duplicate !vote. --  Dane talk  03:03, 31 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, The important encyclopaedia related information will be provided very soon so that the page of Carlos Stolk III is approved by the Wiki Community for history and other important areas of information on the Internet services. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barrenechepedro (talk • contribs) 13:33, 30 March 2018 (UTC)  — Barrenechepedro (talk&#32; contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. ::!Vote has been stricken as from a sockpuppet -- see WP:Sockpuppet_investigations/Klots888  NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:57, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. The informatiom in the article does not show notability   DGG ( talk ) 08:33, 31 March 2018 (UTC)`


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.