Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos E Nemer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was inconclusive and needs more substantial contributions since the professor is a Wikipedia project colaborator. Johnleemk | Talk 10:49, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Carlos E Nemer
Nn-bio; university professor with several degress.-- PeruvianLlama(spit) 22:20, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 15:33, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Abstain - Subject is probably notable for writing books on such diverse subjects... unfortunatly the article currently provides no details. Nevertheless one of the two authors has continued to improve the article since it was flagged. -Meegs 21:32, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. Yes, the authors have continued adding content to the article since I the nom for AfD, and at least seem genuinely interested in making it encyclopaedic. I'm still unconvinced that the subject is necessarily noteworthy, but I'm quite willing to give it some time to see. For the moment, my vote should be considered Abstain. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 04:49, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete since it has been several days, and I've not seen any significant efforts to add any true assertions of notability, or even plain references to this man's existence. I find it odd that each of  the  items  listed under the Biography section turn up no Google results. I'm also put off by the fact that Google searches for "Carlos Nemer",  and "Carlos E* Nemer",  do not give promising results. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 22:24, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I think the publication claims made in the article would certainly satisfy notability. However, I have not been able to verify any of the publications with search engines either.  I don't understand much Portuguese, but I'm pretty sure  this is a list of the faculty of the DEI department of Federal University of Rio de Janeiro and this is a list of the DEIN faculty at the Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro.  Carlos Nemer is not on either list. Despite overwhelming evidence, this just doesn't smell like a hoax.  Nevertheless, I changed my vote above from keep to abstain, but I'm not strongly opposed to a delete any more. -Meegs 12:02, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * CommentYes, the article is improving, but currently no sources are sited and it includes references to Mr. Nemer's hobbies and interests, which are practically impossible to verify. Also, is the original author going to take ownership and continue maintaining the article?  So my vote should also be Abstain.TheRingess 18:20, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hu (talk • contribs) 13:07, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

'''This AfD discussion did not gather enough votes for consensus. There are only two votes other than "abstain" which I think is too few. Relisting. Please add comments below this line.''' &mdash; J I P  | Talk 19:28, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Not verifiable. Capitalistroadster 23:38, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Although subject gets almost no Google hits and his short bibliography is incomplete: nearly all university professors publish papers of some sort, in his case they must not be in English.  This absolutely does not fail to state share of authorship or distinguish type of publication.  The subject's home country may have different academic standards from the United States and perhaps all his work was written in his mother tongue: Portuguese, however from my little knowledge of academia three baccalaureate degrees and two master's degrees is  particularly impressive even in the absence of a doctoral degree. Durova 20:45, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. What Google hits there are Wikipedia and mirrors. No Google book results and the only reference in Google Scholar was a reference to a chap by the name of Carlos Nemer Vieria here


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.