Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Gonzalez "Calofer"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Carlos Gonzalez "Calofer"

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I put this as a BLP prod but I'm starting to wonder how real this is-of course its a bit hard to find Carlos Gonzalez since there is a bunch-so I did try to find Carlos Carlofer and the only result I could find is a car dealership in Florida (kind of instructing since Florida is mentioned) also the articles creator has the same name. Wgolf (talk) 19:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - based on what I read in the article and your reasoning for nomination, this looks like a hoax. – Michael (talk) 22:46, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:15, 1 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 17:43, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Total lack of sources. He may exist but nothing in the article clearly says notable, and without the details it is hard to say what some of the claims mean. The soccer group he is with may well use the name given, but that does not make his position notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:35, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.