Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Hank González (Businessman)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:12, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Carlos Hank González (Businessman)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Senior businessmen article which fails WP:BIO. Nothing to assert notability. Refs are all trade papers. scope_creep (talk) 00:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as clear webhost advertising. SwisterTwister   talk  06:44, 27 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep! - Bloomberg covers his movements. There's significant coverage of him in Spanish language media as one of the most powerful families in Mexico. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ArchitectureNerd (talk • contribs) 14:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:42, 27 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment Explain to me how a mention in Bloomberg, whose business it is to track and create reports on the activities of the capital of the rich, make him notable? Where is the Spanish language media refs? If a person is notable it should be very easy to find salient verifiable information about them in multiple different media channels. For this person, it's all trade papers, which doesn't make them notable. scope_creep (talk) 18:19, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * delete pretty much per 's reasoning, particularly in the most recent comment. Chrissymad  ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  21:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Advertising only. -- Kndimov (talk) 22:34, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I see no indication of notability. This article primarily serves as promotion of the individual rather than providing encyclopaedic content. HighInBC Need help?   23:37, 2 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.