Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Lozada

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 20:09, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

Carlos Lozada
NN, D. ComCat 04:20, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * This appears to be one of a series of bogus VfD's by this user. Guettarda 06:04, 3 August 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep Perfectly good article Tony the Marine 04:38, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. This does not meet any of the Deletion Criteria.  Guettarda 06:01, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. --Carnildo 06:38, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - the chap won the medal of honour! A curate's egg 06:47, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. You are just an attention whore. :(   &mdash;Joseph | Talk 06:50, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Definite keep How about the thousand other soldiers we have written about and if you ask anyone at the club, the pool, the plane, even try to find them on the news, television, books or movies and it's almost as if they never existed?? Then we would have to delete each of those as well. Antonio Mista Pizza Martin
 * Keep and reprimand the nominator: Nominating articles like this one (a well-written article about a person who is notable in his homeland and far more notable than many others with biographies in Wikipedia) trivializes the deletion process. VFD is already bloated and the volunteers manning it are already overworked.  Comcat, I hope you will realize that the extra work you are making for the rest of us just isn't funny. David Cannon 11:05, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * I've open a Request for Comment on User:ComCat. Please comment at Requests for comment/ComCat -- Kaszeta 03:23, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Sound article about a notable person. No reason for deletion. --Joelito 11:39, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep! Vsmith 14:41, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Do I even need to explain why? Cjrs 79 15:31, August 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Nope. &mdash; RJH 15:34, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Considering the amount of nonsense articles that exist in wikipedia, it is incredible that someone would take the time to ask for the deletion of this article, which contains valuable info.<> 15:46, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep As Coburn_Pharr said, I see no reason for deletion, the article contains valuable info about one of the only four Puerto Ricans to recieve the highest military honor. Miguelfp1 16:26, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Does not meet the criteria necessary for deletion. Hall Monitor 16:33, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. A clear case of a page that doesn't meat any of the VfD criteria. -- Kaszeta 21:06, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, not that the outcome is in doubt at this point. We should have an article on every Medal of Honor recipient, IMHO. Tualha (Talk) 00:05, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Forgot to say, the article does need work, though. Tualha (Talk) 00:06, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. GoCardinal 02:55, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep! Are you joking me? Orioneight 03:19, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable hero. Must have made a mistake and did not check for notability. No contest to this vote and probably not even needed.--Jondel 08:14, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and delist. Nominator is ill-informed, obviously.  &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 08:27, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Won the Medal of Honor. Sjakkalle (Check!)  11:07, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Good article, bizarre nomination. Seanherman 13:49, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Give me a break. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 20:09, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page..