Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Rincon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 03:00, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Carlos Rincon

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There is no indication he meets the general notability guidelines. Ninjastic Ninja (talk) 14:07, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and California. Shellwood (talk) 14:32, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 16:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. He made a bunch of films that has a bunch of reviews which therefore gives him a clear pass at WP:CREATIVE I think. CT55555 (talk) 17:16, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think it's clear that Rincon doesn't pass the GNG: my search turned up nothing more than a few single-sentence mentions. Invoking WP:CREATIVE here seems like quite a stretch, in my view. For one thing, I doubt that Rincon "played a major role in co-creating" these films: while a director might qualify, one of nineteen executive producers does not. I also don't think that these films constitute "significant or well-known work" (a higher standard than notability). Notability under WP:CREATIVE requires more than minor roles on the production crews of a few films, I think, and given the lack of any sourcing that discusses Rincon or his work, he doesn't seem to be notable. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:24, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete. Minor roles in the production team of films. As such, it would be hard to argue that he had a significant enough contribution to the reviews in evidence to qualify for criteria 3 of WP:CREATIVE. Further, with zero sources addressing the subject "directly and in detail", I think this article is a bit of a stretch. Further, the subject has not been working very long so this is probably WP:TOOSOON per WP:SUSTAINED. 4meter4 (talk) 15:55, 27 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.