Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Windiz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, ''Pure vandalism. This includes blatant and obvious misinformation'' covers it nicely. TravellingCari 13:54, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Carlos Windiz

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Very strange - possibly a hoax? Article created in one edit (including a citation needed tag) by a user with a single edit. Furthermore, subject of article is not found in Google Books, News, or Web, except for mirrors and related Wikipedia entries. SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 04:16, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom: possible hoax, as evident from the lack of Ghits. Cliff smith  talk  04:32, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Was going to say I'd found him but this is just a mirror site so looks like it's pretty much a hoax doktorb wordsdeeds 04:57, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete; this person isn't listed on the faculty section on the UToronto Psych department website. Almost certainly a hoax. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:59, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: A very elaborate and well-constructed hoax, but User:Mr.Vernon's link proves it's fake. Calor (talk) 05:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete: Not really an elaborate hoax at all...the article is just copied verbatim from Morton Beiser! I think this may make the hoax blatant enough to qualify for speedy deletion under WP:CSD.  As stated on WP:CSD, "'blatant and obvious hoaxes and misinformation' are subject to speedy deletion as vandalism.") --Smeazel (talk) 07:18, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per WP:CSD, even if it isn't obvious it is blatant. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:38, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete as hoax per WP:CSD Red  Thunder  12:26, 21 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.