Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlota Nunez Strutt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 12:19, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Carlota Nunez Strutt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP of a person with no strong or properly sourced indication of notability. She's claimed as the president of an NGO, but there's no substance here about her career beyond stating that she exists -- and the only sourcing present here at all consists of her own Twitter account and the her "our board" profile on the NGO's own self-published website, which are not notability-building sources. She could certainly be eligible to have a Wikipedia article if she could be reliably sourced over WP:GNG, but presidents of NGOs are not entitled to an automatic inclusion freebie just because they exist, and "she exists" is all this article shows or sources. Bearcat (talk) 23:22, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:45, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  The   Magnificentist  12:51, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:48, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

This article is about me, but I would rather not appear on Wikipedia and I don't think that the work that I am doing for this organization is especially newsworthy, as it is a student organization. I don't think I should have a wiki page, as I currently just am a student who chairs an NGO, and I'd also appreciate the privacy of not having this page. Thanks a lot for your understanding. Carlota. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlota17 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 21 August 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 20:10, 24 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per subject request. Not an inherently notable position so I see no good reason why the subject's desire for privacy shouldn't be honoured. Furrykiller (talk) 03:03, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.