Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlsvilleproject


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Snow closure, obvious delete. Could have gone speedy. tedder (talk) 07:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Carlsvilleproject

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:10, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - meaningless drivel. . . Flint McRae (talk) 09:25, 22 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete there is nothing to save here. No reliable sources even have the ability to pick up on something created in a blog a month ago.   GB fan  talk 12:13, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agreed, no reliable sources to establish notability. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 15:05, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: The page claims it was started in September of 2009, the article was created within the first part of October by a User with the same user name as said article. The only other editor is an annanymous IP that presume is the same user. Blatant self promotion,nothing more nothing less. Deathawk (talk) 19:26, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.