Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carly Henderson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:26, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Carly Henderson

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

After removing references that were irrelevant or fluff, I'm left with two good references and two I can't access. For potential notability, I see an interview with Joe Biden and a daytime Emmy nomination, which is very thin and a borderline case in my view. The article was probably written by a marketing company, see Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive 79 Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:27, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 10 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete The two references that are accessible are unbelievably weak. The 'interview' one is a single paragraph that has her name in it. The PDF shows that she was one of about ten producers on a show that was nominated for an Emmy. Not notable. LaMona (talk) 23:51, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Not yet notable. A nomination for an Emmy is not evidence for notability. The work does not appearto obviously justify an article, and the referencesare weak.  DGG ( talk ) 02:24, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. Becky Sayles (talk) 06:23, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.