Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmarthen Amateur Operatic Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  17:32, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Carmarthen Amateur Operatic Society

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has been unsourced since creation in February 2010. Created by a SPA. I cannot find in-depth coverage in RS. Fails WP:ORG. Delete. Just Chilling (talk) 00:58, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are plenty of sources to support this (I don’t have time to add today but I’ll come back to it). The significance lies in its being the oldest musical society in Wales. Mccapra (talk) 07:40, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 07:50, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 07:50, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 07:50, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
 * We should be very slow to assume there are no decent sources for such a venerable organisation. The question is not whether Google knows about it. Rathfelder (talk) 15:32, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment. 1891 is not that old, and the claim is unsourced. The Madrigal Society, for instance, dates back to at least 1744.  I don't think keeping on the basis of age alone is justified, but I have no comment on whether it is actually notable. SpinningSpark 00:44, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - the claim of being "the oldest musical society in Wales" also looks not to be correct - see Melingriffith Brass Band and Treorchy Male Choir. Just Chilling (talk) 00:58, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~   {talk}  12:48, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. We have a claim of significance in the article that isn't true, and a claim on this page that sources will be added, also apparently untrue. All we are left with is a claim that the organisation exists, which is uncited.  Fails WP:NORG big time. SpinningSpark 14:25, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.