Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmel Moore (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to UK Adult Film and Television Awards.  MBisanz  talk 00:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Carmel Moore
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No nontrivial biographical content. No reliable sourcing for biographical content. Only independent sourcing deals with the title of a single film the subject appeared in, which does nothing to establish her own notability. Prior AFD did not reach consensus on whether the UKAFTA awards meet the "well-known and significant industry award standard" of PORNBIO; it has since become clear that they do not because: 1) it was not an industry award, but a personal moneymaking project of one individual and a production company he was associated; the industry group which supposedly sponsored it denies any connection to the awards ; 2) the award was "pay-for-play", with even an award winner acknowledging that "it seemed that all it took to win awards was a few phone calls to the right people and an advance payment for a full table at the event"; and 3) the awards were notoriously given to unrelased videos, and even to non-existent/never-released videos (see, for example, Articles for deletion/Jamie Brooks (actress) (2nd nomination). This is a BLP with no verifiable content concerning the article subject and her work, and that alone compels deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 16:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BLP, as an article about a living person with no reliable sources mentioning her. There is no need to worry about whether the Daily Mail and/or The Guardian are reliable, because neither mentions the subject. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 18:32, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable pornographic actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:34, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete convincing analysis, virtually non-existent article. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 08:03, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 5 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete after following along with the nom's analysis it is clear this subject, and noticing the supposed reliable sources do not provide significant coverage, I can see this fails GNG and therefore BLP. And I guess I shouldn't be surprised by the underhanded activities recounted by the nom. As a BLP, according to WP:BLP, it ''must adhere strictly to all applicable laws in the United States, to this policy, and to Wikipedia's three core content policies: Neutral point of view (NPOV), Verifiability (V), No original research (NOR)...contentious material about living persons...that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed...Steve Quinn (talk) 14:59, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I've looked for reliable sources about this person, as opposed to about Cameron/Hug a hoodie. I can find none. The award is not an industry award. A biography of a living person without significant coverage in reliable sources should be deleted, under our rules. David in DC (talk) 15:41, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- no coverage in reliable 3rd party sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:29, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to UK Adult Film and Television Awards, because the subject is mentioned there. SST  flyer  08:19, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect per SSTflyer. Is mentioned on Awards page, but no reliable sources for standalone article, and majority of that article discusses Cameron's speech anyway. This is Paul (talk) 15:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.