Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmine Rosato Family


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Godfather II (video game). Closing this discussion because I don't believe a third re-list would benefit it at all. The only keep vote has not addressed the issue of notability, which is the reason why this article is here in the first place. (non-admin closure) st170e talk 00:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Carmine Rosato Family

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 17:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep, speedy close. The current inadequate condition of the article is not, in and of itself, a justification for outright deletion. It is evident that a suitable redirect target exists, and this should have been opened as a talk page discussion. AFD is not for cleanup, especially in the absence of any attempt to comply with WP:BEFORE. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 19:20, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * The above is utter nonsense, a silly attempt at wikilawyering that has not worked once. BEFORE is a not a policy, and there is no requirement in AfD to follow such. It is simply a suggestion on how to deal with such articles. This is another form of consensus-seeking discussion, and it is far more productive than putting a tag on a dead page that nobody visits. Regardless of the intentions behind it, this content is not suitable for Wikipedia, so it should be removed. Deletion is most preferable to prevent its recreation, but redirecting is fine as well. However much you disagree with how I do things, at least try to provide an actual argument. TTN (talk) 20:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
 * While I have no opinion on this article at this time, I agree that the above comment is problematic wikilawyering. HW: If you think the article should be kept, please provide some evidence and/or an argument for the subject's notability. If you think the content could be merged somewhere, or the article could be turned into a redirect, please identify a target. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:49, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:26, 13 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  23:47, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Godfather II (video game). Extremely minor fictional characters, whose article is nothing but unsourced cruft.  Looking for information on the characters, the only hits that come up are things like game guides for the video game they come from, which does not establish notability.  I mean, I'd be fine with a complete Delete, really, but a redirect is appropriate as well.  64.183.45.226 (talk) 17:35, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Godfather II (video game) per above comment. Aoba47 (talk) 15:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.