Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carnarvon Road, Hong Kong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 06:59, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Carnarvon Road, Hong Kong

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

While there are some trivial mentions in the news, and the fact that it has an article on zhwiki, this seems to be a non-notable road.  LinguistAtLarge &bull; Msg  20:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC)  LinguistAtLarge &bull; Msg  20:55, 21 January 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  21:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It's obvious even from the English language Ghits that it's a major shopping and restaurant street & thus appropriate for an article. Yes, I know there are a great many significant shopping and restaurant streets in Hong Kong. We will therefore appropriately have quite a number of articles. However many, we're NOT PAPER DGG (talk) 18:12, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 09:15, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Barely, but keep nonetheless. Alberon (talk) 11:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Just sufficiently notable as a matter of opinion. Collect (talk) 13:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment - I'll be happy to withdraw this nomination, especially if someone can find a reference or two to add to the article. (I can't seem to find any).  LinguistAtLarge &bull; Msg  16:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.