Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carnival Pinnacle (ship)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was redirect. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  02:13, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Carnival Pinnacle (ship)
Crystal ball speculation at this time. Carnival's most recent press release on the matter of new vessels (that I can find) indicates only three, Carnival Freedom, Carnival Splendor, and a 130,000 ton Un-Named Carnival Ship, none of which come remotely close to the size of the predicted vessel mentioned here. I also doubt they'd name this vessel 'before' naming the 130,000 tn ship.

An anon user removed my prodtag and added an article from Florida Today, which in my opinion says "its all speculation" The CEOs of Carnival and Fincantieri (Carnival's preferred shipbuilder) say that the "Pinnacle Project" (as dubbed by the paper) is at the discussion stage, with "nothing on the table". -- saberwyn 00:19, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Per below, I would support a redirect without merge to Carnival Cruise Lines as a second option. -- saberwyn 00:27, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The subject of the article has had some media coverage, but mostly contains speculation thus failing the Wikipedia is not a cystal ball policy. I suggest a redirect to the Carnival Cruise Lines article, at least until more about the project is revealed.-- ☆ TBC ☆ (aka Tree Biting Conspiracy) 00:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I'll second TBC's redirect idea. -- Kicking222 01:35, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Carnival Cruise Lines for the moment until further sources and information can form a proper article on its own. --Ter e nce Ong 02:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect There are other articles out there indicating that the project has gone onto the back burner, so crystal ball is applicable. Georgewilliamherbert 00:46, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Until such time as the ship is ordered it should not be listed in the Carnival page with existing or constructing ships, nor should it have its own page. This resource should not be used for speculation or creating hype. Kablammo 00:07, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.