Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol (Dilbert)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of Dilbert characters. J04n(talk page) 23:04, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Carol (Dilbert)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is an unsourced mess, and the character itself isn't really notable. There is little to nothing here of value that is not already at List of Dilbert characters. It's mostly describing one-off strips, which may or may not be canon and definitely are not meaingful.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  16:23, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 7 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I think that the reasons given in the nominations are things that need improvement in the article, or references, or editing. They aren't reasons alone to delete.  However, if it can be shown that sources don't exist to verify the claims in there article (and thus those parts are removed), and then the article is the same as at List of Dilbert characters, then it should be redirected not deleted. Senator2029 ★ talk 18:46, 7 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect per nom, along with all the other secondary characters. (World's smartest garbageman? Come on.) I'd venture to do the same with some of the so-called "primary" ones, such as Asok (Dilbert). Clarityfiend (talk) 09:43, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.