Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Armstrong


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (WP:SNOW close). North America1000 07:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Carol Armstrong

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:PROF. Kevin12xd 23:29, 25 March 2017 (UTC)


 * FYI, part of Meetup/San Francisco/Art+Feminism@SFAI 2017 and still a work-in-progress StrayBolt (talk) 23:59, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
 * She meets Notability_(academics) Criterion 5 by being the Doris Stevens Professor of Women’s Studies at Princeton. StrayBolt (talk) 05:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep She was the holder of a named professorship which meets academic criteria #5. She may also meet others, but meeting any one is enough to demonstrate notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:15, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per StrayBolt . The named chair is just the clearest of several vectors to notability. --Theredproject (talk) 17:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep per StrayBolt. She likely also qualifies under academic criteria #1 for significant impact in her scholarly discipline. Dreamyshade (talk) 18:53, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I hadn't added the "chair" info when Kevin12 raised the issue. Any suggestions as to how much more I should add to the article to reach critical mass? What is the next step? StrayBolt (talk) 01:25, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * you need not worry as votes are all for keep so far. She is clearly notable198.58.162.200 (talk) 01:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:40, 31 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. Contrary to the nomination statement, clearly passes WP:PROF on several criteria (named professorship at Princeton, library holdings, a Guggenheim Fellowship, etc.) as well as being the subject of a reasonable amount of coverage in independent sources. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 14:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. A named professorship at Princeton, Guggenheim Fellow, a CAA book award; clearly passes WP:PROF on several counts. Nsk92 (talk) 14:22, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Snow keep per WP:PROF —David Eppstein (talk) 18:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Bad nomination. In addition to the above, she is a Guggenheim fellow.198.58.162.200 (talk) 01:35, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Subject is obviously notable, has published widely, is a tenured full professor at Yale University, and prior to that at Princeton and Berkeley. She is a Guggenheim fellow. I think the nomination for deletion was not well considered. Netherzone (talk) 02:07, 1 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.