Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Smallwood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. per SK1 - Nom withdrawn (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 00:05, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Carol Smallwood

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

doesn't seem to make NAUTHOR, NACADEMIC or GNG. John from Idegon (talk) 07:26, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 09:13, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 09:13, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. How does it not make those guidelines with these sources? The Drover&#39;s Wife (talk) 13:49, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as several editors have worked on the article, and there is still litte evidence of siginificant acknowledgment in secondary sources. She is in a couple of directories. The poetry awards are small time. The simple fact is that there is almost no general interest whatsoever in her as an author. This is a vanity page, edited extensively by Carol Smallwood.104.163.139.13 (talk) 17:07, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:28, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep I found multiple reviews of her work on EBSCO and HighBeam. I've been adding sources to the article. The reviews make her article pass NAUTHOR. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:01, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - Thanks for making notability more clear. Meets WP:NAUTHOR. Hmlarson (talk) 20:30, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Latest version meets NAUTHOR. Binksternet (talk) 07:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Withdraw - with thanks to for her improvements. Now if we can only keep the subject of the article away from it..... John from Idegon (talk) 15:50, 11 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.