Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Zara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Carol Zara

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable BLP, even among Internet "celebrities". Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  00:35, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Although the nomination rationale is completely weak and may ultimately lead to failure in this attempt because of it, I couldn't find any significant coverage from reliable sources other than a mention on G4's Women of the Web. Google news and books turned up nil for her name and/or website, and the references in the article itself are unreliable blogs, blogs, and more blogs. Vodello (talk) 01:48, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks notability established through significant coverage by reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Fails WP:ENT and WP:GNG. Cindamuse (talk) 03:23, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete completely self-promotional BLP lacking any reliable independent sources to establish notability. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 13:52, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The listed sources include one blog, the rest are major sites including MTV Brazil. Carol has enough notable achievements to meet wikipedia's standards.  (Rhymestyle (talk) 16:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC))
 * The vast majority of the sources do not meet WP:RS and consist mainly of social networking sites and non-notable fan type websites. Could you please expand on exactly which of her "notable achievements" meet the criteria as outlined at WP:ENT? Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 16:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Notable achievements? She works for MTV Brazil and was featured on G4_TV, those two are sufficient enough. Also what do you consider a major site? These sources listed on the page aren't exactly sites that go unnoticed, these are major sites. If you want to argue that the sites aren't good enough sources, then there are thousands of other wiki pages that should be up for deletion too.(98.223.177.254 (talk) 20:44, 20 October 2010 (UTC))
 * I did not use the words 'major site' as they do not have any relevance to my argument; what I referred to are reliable sites which have everything to do with notability and WP:BLP articles in general. Whatever appears in other Wikipedia articles is also irrelevant as WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 20:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Isn't MTV, G4, and Virgin Gaming reliable enough? That's three. (Rhymestyle (talk) 02:01, 21 October 2010 (UTC))
 * Delete: The issue with "her" is not so much that she is not a celebrity, becuase celebrity is controversial. The problem that keeps this from being kept is that not even a single three of the article's references have any tangible investigatory jumping-off point. Get three reliable sources, and the article might be of snowball keep standard. M'kay?--Cymbelmineer (talk) 23:43, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.