Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolina Bible College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. &mdash; Scientizzle 17:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Carolina Bible College

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't seem to be notable; written in a spammy tone; only 'reference' is the school website. -- Menti  fisto  03:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup Aren't institutions of higher education, such as colleges, considered inherently notable? Nyttend (talk) 03:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Nyttend. It's a real institution, in Fayetteville, NC.   If the problem is the spammy tone, then that can be fixed.  This one needs to be linked, since there is a Category:Bible colleges.  For additional categories, see, e.g. Johnson Bible College Mandsford (talk) 03:53, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Start Over Rewrite . Original content should be tossed, but the college is generating WP:RS coverage that comes with higher ed institutions. An editor is currently trying to fix the article. Otherwise, I'd suggest stubbing and starting over. • Gene93k (talk) 04:03, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Copyvio. I thought it was only borderline WP:CSD yesterday, but it's blatant. (home page and history page ) • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep As it is an academic institution, there is no valid reason to delete the article, but it certainly could be cleaned up dramatically. Use of third party sources could help. — BQZip01 —  talk 04:28, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - A good number of Google News Results that contain "Carolina Bible College" I have not vetted the sources though. Fosnez (talk) 06:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Colleges are inherently notable, and this school is no exception. Alansohn (talk) 07:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.