Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolina Munhóz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. Per CSD G12. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 01:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Carolina Munhóz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No notability established. Sources are blogs with some interviews. Text is overly promotional. seicer &#x007C;  talk  &#x007C;  contribs  04:53, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep, surely needs some wikifying and rewriting, but most sources are definitely not just blogs; article passes our WP:GNG. Victão Lopes  Fala! 19:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 05:37, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Speedy WP:TNT per C.Fred's discovery below. Comment: Which of those awards are notable? (I'm assuming city lists aside from maybe Rio aren't, whereas nationwide ones could be.)  Pax 08:10, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 13:45, 24 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Start from scratch with free text—current version is copyvio. I think the author passes GNG. The problem is with the prose: it's copied from http://www.carolinamunhoz.com/blog/english/ wholesale. Since there's no free license posted on that page, we can't use it. The article cannot be used without a complete rewrite. —C.Fred (talk) 13:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.