Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Brady (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 21:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Caroline Brady
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

previously deleted article by disruptive new editor, non notable soap opera character. Rm994 (talk) 02:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable. --DThomsen8 (talk) 13:40, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep, at least pending review. There's something odd going on here. This isn't a second AFD, the recent deletion was a copyright speedy. That may not have been correct; it's unusual to see an article that was around as long as this one wasto be deleted that way. The logs indicate a history of vandalism, and I think someone with access to the deleted version should check to see if there was a salvageable noncopyvio version in the edit history. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:04, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Shouldn't this be merged somewhere so we don't have to try and figure out if it's notable or not? Polarpanda (talk) 16:40, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep central character on a major network show for 25+ years. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  19:20, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * DeleteNotability issues aside the article at the very least needs to be heavily copyedited and referenced / cited. There are no citations in the entire article and the only references are soap opera blogs and IMDB neither of which pass muster for notability.  Delete article and recreate a section under the soap opera's main page or the brady family article is the best solution in my opinion  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nefariousski (talk • contribs) 23:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Starblind. Edward321 (talk)
 * Keep key character to the soap opera days of our lives. Matriarch of the Brady Family, regular cast member since 1983, she deserves her own page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by [REDACTED] 03:51, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

I don't see anything wrong with the article. I added more references, all the information is true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabi Hernandez (talk • contribs) 22:56, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.