Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Howarth


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 04:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Caroline Howarth

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

not notable, info could be merged into other articles Saveourcity (talk) 02:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Does not appear to pass WP:PROF for now. Very little in GoogleBooks and GoogleScholar does not indicate significant citability either. Similar results in Scopus. I looked up her website and did not see anything else (awards, honors, etc) there that would indicate passing WP:PROF, except for being on editorial boards of two journals. That is not sufficient for passing WP:PROF yet. Nsk92 (talk) 03:17, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I agree with Nsk92 that she is't there yet, but especially the two editorial board memberships indicate that some people think she's somebody important in her field, or becoming important. Still, WP is not a crystal ball. --Crusio (talk) 07:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Not yet--11 papers in Scopus (relatively complete for European social Sciences) Most cited papers, 12, 11, 11; membership on an editorial board or an associate editor is only an early step in what might become a notable career eventually. DGG (talk) 03:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.