Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Nicholls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 19:59, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Caroline Nicholls

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable newsreader - as the article about her says, she only works part-time. Also, the article has had the tag saying "May not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines" for quite some time now. Vorbee (talk) 19:15, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:10, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:10, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:11, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:11, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:12, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Delete Fails WP:NOTABILITY. A Google News searched turned up only one article from Radio Times. Basically little to no coverage, so that fails WP:SIGCOV as well. Rosalina2427 (talk to me) 16:08, 1 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Easy Delete Being a stub is not an issue, but per WP:BLP and WP:GNG article fails on both counts. Shushugah (talk) 16:09, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Lack of reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. PohranicniStraze (talk) 18:16, 1 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Lack of source. Even a stub cannot be expanded. GenuineArt (talk) 13:27, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. News anchors are not handed an automatic free pass over our notability standards for journalists just because their existence can technically be referenced to a staff profile on the self-published website of their own employer: the notability test for a journalist depends on receiving independently-given coverage in media outlets that don't sign her paycheque. But there are literally no other sources being cited here to boost her notability at all. Bearcat (talk) 19:48, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete not every news anchor is default notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:19, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Too few sources. Fails WP:GNG —AE  ( talk  •  contributions ) 03:25, 8 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.