Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Pierce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 23:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Caroline Pierce

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No nonscene awards or nominations. No independent reliable sourcing. No reliably sourced biographical content. PROD bulk-removed (apparently via rollback) with a null edit summary. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:42, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 16 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails PORNBIO as nominator states. Fails GNG without reliable source coverage. Searches for RS coverage get hits for other people with the same name. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete pern nom. Subject fails PORNBIO and BASIC. -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:PORNBIO because she starred in the "iconic, groundbreaking or blockbuster feature" Slaughter Disc. Rebecca1990 (talk) 01:17, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you might provide sourcing for the claim that this film is "iconic", "groundbreaking". or a "blockbuster". AVN said it "really is not a good movie"; other website reviews ranged from the lukewarm to "just another bag of garbage for the already putrid pile". What objective basis is there for your unlikely claim? Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:14, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
 * WP:NOT??? Spartaz Humbug! 06:53, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * delete BLPs require much better sourcing then this. Spartaz Humbug! 06:53, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per Rebecca1990. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   09:17, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Does not pass the notability requirements for porn actors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:07, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as fails PORNBIO - →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  11:11, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.