Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Pires


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 21:20, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Caroline Pires

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Irrelevant actress never did anything notable. The first "reference" used in the article do not mentions her (and thus, does not supports what's supposed to reference) and the second is just a trivial mention in a huge listing. Damiens .rf 18:58, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - She is credited in IMDB as being on the show, but it's a completely non-notable role. The rest of what's on that article is unverifiable autobiographical cruft. §FreeRangeFrog 19:16, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Here's validation of her modeling claims, however that seems to be the modeling agency page so it's not reliable. It seems this girl might be on the threshold of being notable... but she's not, yet, so she fails WP:ENTERTAINER right now. Maybe later. §FreeRangeFrog 19:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The agency is not independent . There's no reason to question their reliability. - Mgm|(talk) 10:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * There's no reason to accept it, either, given that their information would be a clear conflict of interest, so it wouldn't be a good primary source. It would be irrelevant other than as supporting material for the secondary claim of notability based on modeling activity. But you're right, wrong term. §FreeRangeFrog 17:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. She's not notable now. As FreeRangeFrog indicated, she might become notable in the future, with more modeling and more press coverage. The deletion debate covers her and the article right now, though, and there's insufficient notability and a dearth of reliable sources. —C.Fred (talk) 04:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable, and perhaps a violation of WP:VANITY as well. ¿SFGi Д nts!  ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 16:28, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - particularly non-notable WP:ENTERTAINER. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.