Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Shotton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  00:28, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Caroline Shotton

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I couldn't establish that she meets WP:ARTIST or WP:GNG. Possible WP:ATD would be redirect to Mona Lisa replicas and reinterpretations, but I am not sure it would be helpful. Boleyn (talk) 19:00, 16 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 02:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  02:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Women,  and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 19:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  20:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment There is a review in the The Guardian by the art critic Jonathan Jones: . While this does count towards GNG - it is insufficient on its own. ResonantDistortion 23:02, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.