Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline St John-Brooks

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 14:54, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

Caroline St John-Brooks
Caroline St John-Brooks, who sadly passed away almost a year and a half ago, was a "British journalist and academic." I've just refactored in real-time all there is to read within this substub. Does this alone meet the "requirements" for inclusion on Wikipedia? Do the 321 google hits help? GRider\talk 00:12, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * keep seems notable enough.Wolfman 00:33, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Author of at least four books. Notable academic in the field of education. – flamurai (t) 02:04, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, and expand. Notable. Megan1967 08:55, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 11:41, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Former editor of the Times Educational Supplement which together with her record of publications suggests that she is notable in the field of British education. Capitalistroadster 14:25, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.