Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Worsley, Lady Worsley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to James Carnegie, 3rd Duke of Fife. There is consensus to not keep the article. However, redirects are cheap and may be created by anyone in the normal course of editing so I will go with delete and redirect. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:50, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Caroline Worsley, Lady Worsley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is nothing but a genealogical entry. There is nothing more to be said about the subject anyway because there is no coverage in reliable sources other than genealogy publications. As the topic does not pass WP:BASIC, there is no reason for Wikipedia to have this article. Surtsicna (talk) 19:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 19:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 19:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Surtsicna (talk) 19:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom  --Devokewater  @  09:53, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to James Carnegie, 3rd Duke of Fife as there are enough mentions in other articles to warrant a few lines, if not an article. Bogger (talk) 10:07, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Cannot find more than passing mention in genealogical books. JoelleJay (talk) 06:26, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable wife of a noble.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:59, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect per, WP:CHEAP, and my standards for nobility. If she'd had her own career, or done charity patronages, or been involved in a scandal, that would be different. She's the wife of a prominent British nobleman. Bearian (talk) 14:33, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No sign of independent notability.  --Lockley (talk) 00:24, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete or at best Redirect. Seems to only be notable by association. -Kj cheetham (talk) 17:11, 8 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.