Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline seagull


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 07:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Caroline seagull

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable company. The target of a BBC program, good, but that isn't sufficient; if the program is notable it should have an article. The program wasn't about the importance/screen value of the company itself but more about the circumstances in which it found itself. Ironholds (talk) 20:53, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 21:09, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:CORP.  The only quoted source just mentions the firm among other failed coach operators, I don't think it counts as _ substantial significant_ coverage. Tevildo (talk) 21:35, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORP. Possibly of minor interest to the locality in which it traded - maybe some text could be included as a short section in Great Yarmouth? -- 09:23, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - not notable as a company within local area - no local press coverage that I can find with a WP:SET - Blue Square Thing (talk) 23:38, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.