Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolyn Browne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 02:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Carolyn Browne

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Ambassadors are not inherently notable. I don't see anything about this diplomat that qualifies her as notable under any other rationale. Flaming Ferrari (talk) 13:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - she's in Who's Who. Barney the barney barney (talk) 15:49, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - District judges are also listed in Who's Who, but that alone is not sufficient for them to warrant inclusion by WP standards. Flaming Ferrari (talk) 16:05, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Oxford University Press feels that she's notable (Who's Who) and she's widely quoted in the press. Pburka (talk) 23:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - not as a diplomat per se, but due to sourcing per WP:GNG. Bearian (talk) 21:56, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.