Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolyn Joyce Carty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 11:40, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Carolyn Joyce Carty
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Previously blanked and redirected, but I beleive it deserves a chance at AfD. That said, teh subject shows no particular signs of notability outside of a claim of authorship of Footprints (poem), in which she is not unique. Artw (talk) 16:23, 14 November 2009 (UTC) Artw (talk) 16:23, 14 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Alright, fair enough. Delete. Subject is one of three or four main contenders who has claimed authorship of Footprints (poem), but is otherwise not notable. This article was most likely to a large degree penned by the subject herself (Compare and contrast with or ).  henrik  • talk  16:32, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 19:15, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Her only claim to fame is alleged authorship of a poem. An authorship that was rejected by the New York District Court. The previous AfD was withdrawn, due to OTRS concerns/issues according to Deletion review/Log/2009 January 25. jonathon (talk) 20:20, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, it's a bit more complex than that actually. That is a deletion review discussion, asking that the article be created as a redirect. That request to create it was withdrawn when the OTRS ticket was uncovered. It was deleted and salted (protected from recreation) by User:Swatjester. Unfortunately, when User:Aervanath restored it temporarily to note the OTRS number, he forgot to reprotect it against creation, and here we are again. :) In October, 2009 it was recreated, most likely by the same person who had been previously banned from Wikipedia for making legal threats. Regardless, I think it would be useful to have a community consensus on whether we want to have an article on this subject at all without taking all that backdrop into account: we should evaluate this article on its own merits. henrik  • talk  22:22, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete from "child prodigy" to being thanked by the Pope, this article is all fluff and garbage. Any attempt to clean it up results in a slam of links to amazon.com selling this book or countless category tags. Kill it!Vinithehat (talk) 00:19, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete subject has no notability &rArr;   SWAT Jester    Son of the Defender  14:45, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, WP:AB. --4wajzkd02 (talk) 00:07, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.