Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolyn Lamm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep.  Yash  t  101   07:21, 1 May 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

Carolyn Lamm

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Only notability I'm seeing is through a press release through ABA. I'm not convinced the award alone meets notability requirements. --  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 04:07, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've fleshed out the article some, although I'm not entirely as savvy about the whole legal and government scene, so I'll refrain from voting for right now.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:12, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Tokyogirl is being far too modest. The article is now more than adequately cited with convincing proof of notability from a range of publications. The article, now much improved, hasn't a snowball's of being deleted now. Nom should note that the criterion is that RS exist, not that they're in the article, by the way. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:24, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - President of the ABA, presence in Washingtonian mag's list seem to be enough to establish notability.JoelWhy (talk) 12:48, 24 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Per JoelWhy. Lord Roem (talk) 17:41, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.