Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolyn Mackenzie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). N ORTH A MERICA 1000 17:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Carolyn Mackenzie

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:BLP, relying exclusively on primary sources like her own Twitter and her bio on the "our personalities" section of her own employer's website, of a person whose main claim of notability is as a local television news anchor in a single media market. This is not a claim of notability that entitles a person to an article under WP:JOURNALIST, if properly reliable, independent sourcing isn't there to support it — if a television journalist is associated with anything below the national news division of a national television network, then you need a "more notable than the norm" claim (e.g. winning a notable journalism award), or a volume of coverage substantive enough to vault them over WP:GNG, to get them into Wikipedia. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 21:22, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Keep - Additional sources have been added. Magnolia677 (talk) 00:44, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * You added two sources, of which one is a journalism school newsletter and the other is a "celebrities show off their homes" puff piece in a newspaper's Homes & Condos section. And you're still relying on a "PR bio on the website of her own employer" for source #3. So no, you're still at exactly zero valid sources — Wikipedia requires verification of notability via reliable, independent and substantive media coverage, not merely verification of existence in absolutely any web page you can find that happens to have her name in it, to keep articles about living people. Bearcat (talk) 01:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nova Scotia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:00, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:42, 11 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sing! 07:19, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.