Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolyn Obi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. However, if someone wants it to actively work on in draft space, I'm happy to provide it. Star  Mississippi  02:17, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Carolyn Obi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:18, 29 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:31, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football,  and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:18, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Draftify.--MonFrontieres (talk) 23:53, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Source 4 in the article seems to be a video on her, which is SIGCOV and may or may not meet rule 3 in WP:N. Regardless, source 5 and  should be enough to push her over the GNG line. EternalNomad (talk) 02:22, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The video from EMTV is almost an exact word for word copy of meaning that only counts (if that) as one source. The Post Courier source is worthless (she's a teammate's favourite player). The OFC source isn't independent of her as she played in one of their tournaments. Dougal18 (talk) 14:06, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:51, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak delete. The sources in the article are: 1-3, 5: From Oceania Football Federation, a governing org for her sport and therefore not independent. 4: Reasonable coverage in EMTV (~10 sentences on her). The sources from MF and EN above: 6: Same source as 5. 7: Same source as 4. 8: Literally a "favorite [blank]"-type questionnaire filled in by the subject herself (clearly fails independence). Can we get more non-EMTV sources covering her in depth? JoelleJay (talk) 01:06, 9 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.