Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caron Myers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was    Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 22:55, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Caron Myers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not appear to satisfy WP:NOTE. Cirt (talk) 12:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Though the article doesn't currently indicate WP:BIO notability, a Google search in citation marks gives about 22,000 hits which, though by no means unfallible, suggests that there may be some notability going on; none of the hits I browsed through, however, clearly established this as WP:RS reliable secondary sources, so I'm still largely undecided. My "vote" of weak keep is based on giving the article the benefit of the reasonable doubt. - Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 16:58, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Amount of Google hits is not really the best rationale, per Search_engine_test. Cirt (talk) 17:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Most Google News hits I can find for the subject are articles she wrote as a journalist for a television station, and the more recent ones only mention her as giving statements in her capacity as spokeswoman for a school system. Unless some sources can be found that actually discuss her, rather than just being written by her or mentioning her as speaking for her employer, my inclination is to support deletion. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:25, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - I can find articles written by Meyers, and I can find articles where she is quoted in her capacity as a spokesperson. What I cannot find are articles written about her.  She is not the subject of coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 16:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pastor Theo (talk) 02:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - My search gets the same result as Whpq. JohnCD (talk) 21:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.