Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrefour Militari metro station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Proposed merger target has also been deleted at AFD. Jenks24 (talk) 08:15, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Carrefour Militari metro station

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

per WP:CRYSTAL, this station is planned for 2030 and the name is not used in any references. Strainu (talk) 08:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:21, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:22, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: 2030 is a little too far in the future, and per WP:CRYSTAL seeing as no significant work has taken place or been referenced, this article should be deleted. Very likely that when it has begun major construction or is complete that an article should exist :) -- samtar talk or stalk 20:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL. Class455fan1 (talk) 23:49, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge, tentatively. Could this be properly merged with Depoul Militari metro station?  That is a "provisional" metro station that was opened in 2014.  Perhaps it is the temporary version of Depoul Militari?
 * Note some confusion in the templates of links between stations. At the Carrefour Militari article the "following" station is Preciziei metro station.  At Preciziei, the "preceding" station is Depoul Militari metro station.
 * Also, are any of the series of stations individually notable? Perhaps they should just be covered in a list-article, and the current AFD should be closed "Merge" to that.  Or they all should be Merged to one article about the metro line.
 * Of course a planned future station can be mentioned at a list-article or an overall article about the line. So far this AFD discussion does not reflect a lot of knowledge about the actual physical situation. -- do  ncr  am  21:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete instead and only mention at the amount needed since it's not finished or built yet so there's certainly no notability to suggest better. SwisterTwister   talk  21:09, 21 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.