Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carriage Room


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ifnord (talk) 03:41, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Carriage Room

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability to pass WP:NCORP. WP:Run-of-the-mill venue with no distinguishing characteristics. Reywas92Talk 01:55, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 December 9.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 02:19, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 05:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 05:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 05:56, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 05:58, 9 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:GNG. User:Reywas92 has nominated several articles for deletion at once, so now I have to scramble to find sources for multiple subjects, but I believe there's sufficient coverage for an article. I've spent at least an hour combing through some old newspaper articles, and now the article has 22 inline citations. Hopefully this can be further expanded over time. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 06:32, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:GNG and 's recent expansion, which included boosting the number of references from 2 to 22. There's significant history covered in the article now. -Pete Forsyth (talk) 18:53, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep – Per sources in the article, appears to meet WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:AUD, the latter per statewide coverage in The Oregonian. Most of the sources are not linked, so AGF. North America1000 03:23, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, I expanded the article by using my Multnomah County Library membership to access The Oregonian archives. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:31, 16 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.