Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrie Keller-Lynn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  15:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Carrie Keller-Lynn

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Blatant WP:BLP1E. Sources are weak, either not third-party (itrek) or sourced to a "site readers can rely on for smart, engaged, entertaining writing about all things books." (Subject is not a book, nor an author of a book.) Brazilian Forum source, whether RS or not, has only eight sentences in the article which are about Keller-Lynn, even broadly considered. Searching found no better sources. Note: I have edited the article since filing the AfD in two ways: removed an unsourced claim that the subject is American-Israeli", and remove a claim that a photo was deleted from a website, which was both not in the given source and provably false, as I indicated on the talk page. This claim had been being used to justify a fair-use basis for hosting a copyrighted photo, so I removed the photo itself from the article. Further: I have now removed claims sourced to a self-published source added after the start of the AfD, in violation of WP:BLPSPS -- Nat Gertler (talk) 15:40, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism,  and Israel. Shellwood (talk) 16:59, 24 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:JOURNALIST by a country mile. The irony is that often bios of journalists are puffery and apparently self-written. This article gives the opposite impression. That said, we have an article here that totally fails to show reliable sourcing such as to satisfy the stringent requirements of the guideline. A WP:MILL writer albeit one who has received negative attention from people who don't like her. Coretheapple (talk) 20:56, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. A regular person at work. Nothing that makes her stand out from the rest of the journalists. Fails JOURNALIST and even the GNG. gidonb (talk) 21:36, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete As per nom. also Fails WP:JOURNALIST Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 09:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails notability requirements.BobFromBrockley (talk) 17:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.