Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrie Morgridge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) JAaron95  Talk   10:41, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Carrie Morgridge

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Assertions of notability rely on red-link awards from red-link organisations. Bazj (talk) 12:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. Bazj (talk) 12:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bazj (talk) 12:20, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bazj (talk) 12:21, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak keep: I worked on this article after finding it PRODded. Her notability relies on WP:GNG. She has press coverage, which I believe is significant. The "weak" part is that it is not broad. Cited within the article, there are articles focusing entirely on her in The Denver Post and The Chronicle of Philanthropy and one focusing heavily on her and the foundation in The Denver Business Journal. There's an interview by ICOSA. Not cited in the article (and hence linked here) I've seen an interview by Foundation, what looks to be a targeted small paper profile, and a brief interview with Aspen Public Radio. Also not mentioned in the article, her first book made JP Morgan's Reading List (, . In terms of the notability of her awards, I can't really speak to that because I don't have time to research them, but as WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST notes, the absence of the articles doesn't mean they aren't notable awards. It simply means nobody has written about them yet. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Moonriddengirl. Sources show subject satisfies GNG. postdlf (talk) 17:37, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * keep as per User:Postdlf. However, it's sort of borderline, and might be better as a joint article including John Morgridge and the philanthropic projects they undertake together.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:56, 7 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.