Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrie Wheeler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:50, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Carrie Wheeler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NBIO. All the coverage that I see of her is routine news or incidental mention Rogermx (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 19:56, 24 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment - I'm still looking and haven't made up my mind yet, but there's at least one source that provides more than routine coverage. This from the NYPost discusses her retirement from the Texas Pacific Group as the head of retail investments for the company.  Clover moss  (talk) 22:17, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Aside from the New York Post article that mentions, I was unable to find anything that covered her significantly enough to qualify for GNG. Missvain (talk) 20:55, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I also found this from  The New York Times, there appears to be at least a few paragraphs about her. There's this  article from Yahoo Finance. I'm still looking for more possible sources, but do these seem significant enough for notability?  Clover moss  (talk) 21:10, 27 January 2020 (UTC) Clarification: I just realized the second article is a press release and thus not revelant.  Clover moss  (talk) 21:14, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * The New York Times article (here it is archived) doesn't provide significant coverage, but, if we were able to find a few more citations like that - we could establish using WP:BASIC. Missvain (talk) 21:15, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, there's also this from Buyout Insider, which references the NYPost article. There's one sentence about her in this article in the Wall Street Journal, and a sentence in The Gazette . With the two more detailed sources and two other ones be enough combined to meet WP:BASIC?  Clover moss  (talk) 21:32, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * One sentence isn't really enough for me. That's just a passing mention. I think there needs to be more significant mentions - paragraphs, etc, like the NYT article. Feel free to make your case if you feel otherwise, but, I'm not seeing enough to change my opinion. I also saw a number of those passing mentions and didn't even consider including them in my comment. Missvain (talk) 21:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I can accept that,and I'm inclined to !vote delete myself. Apart from the Buyout Insider coverage, I haven't been able to find anything more significant than that, and I've spent a lot of time looking (and you've looked as well). I like to be as thorough as I can before voting delete, and I appreciate your advice on what I was able to find. Clover moss  (talk) 21:44, 27 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - there currently isn't enough in-depth coverage to demonstrate notability. Clover moss  (talk) 21:47, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per Clovermoss and Missvain's findings. Best, GPL93 (talk) 22:34, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Can't find any suitable sources to salvage this. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  21:27, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Other than working, it's unclear what she's done that's notable. Bearian (talk) 18:34, 30 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.