Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrillo Symphony Orchestra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Carrillo Symphony Orchestra
Nomination for deletion Probable hoax. No hits on google except mirrors of wikipedia. No hits on google books. . No Factiva hits.

I am also nominating the related article Victoriano Carrillo, the supposed founder of the supposed orchestra (note that the Tony Carrillo mentioned in article seems real but totally unrelated). Also see the related afd for Roberto Carrillo. These articles were all created by the same user who also at one point claimed an ancient English dukedom for this Filipino Carrillo family. Bwithh 02:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go sit on my throne and issue a few pronouncements. --Aaron 03:19, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nothing out there gives any evidence that the orchestra exists.   If the author can provide reliable sources to it's touring in the Philippines, I'll reconsider. --  The Bethling (Talk) 03:49, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Blatantly obvious hoax by an individual with massive delusions of superiority. Resolute 05:03, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Sounds like a hoax. Will run this through deletion sorting just to be sure.Shushruth \talk page \ contribs 05:14, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletions.   -- Shushruth \talk page \  contribs 05:13, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete in 3/4 time, please. Hoax or classical version of a garage band, doesn't matter.  Robert A.West (Talk) 06:53, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, hoax, garbage. It seems like some imaginary orchestra. --Ter e nce Ong (T 07:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. MikeWazowski 18:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete; hoax, nonsense. --MCB 23:42, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Someone is stringing us along.  RFerreira 22:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.