Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carrot cake cookie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Carrot cake. Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Carrot cake cookie

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable cookie that does not pass WP:GNG, references consist of recipes and trivial mentions. WP:BEFORE check yielded no sources that show WP:SIGCOV. Should be merged into Carrot cake if not deleted outright. BaduFerreira (talk) 21:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. BaduFerreira (talk) 21:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete I have bookmarked scores of cookies I'd like to try making. This one isn't in it, but it appears to be a prime example of something that's just an inspired recipe with many variations, not a notable dish that's cohesively described outside of a cookbook writer's introduction. This could be a sentence in Carrot cake. Reywas92Talk 02:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge to Carrot cake and redirect, at least for now. It's possible this one could get there -- oreo makes a version, subway and aldis have a version, I've added that content+refs. Gourmet did something in 2004, but on a quick search I'm not finding it, and it was not unlikely it was a simple recipe, but if anyone can figure out their archives, ping me to a link and I'll add. Commercial uptake is probably a promising sign for this cookie's notability, so it would be good to have that info at carrot cake for future consideration. Valereee (talk) 12:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Selective Merge to Carrot cake, which presently has no mention other than a link in its See also section. North America1000 10:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Merge as suggested, as a good compromise. Bearian (talk) 14:34, 17 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.