Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carter & Burgess


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit 02:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Carter & Burgess
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The page reads like a corporate website. A web search finds a few newspapers articles on the company, but all are Person X hired by Carter/Burgess. This page needs alot of work if the company is notable.  New England  Review Me!/ Go Red Sox! 06:59, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless notability can be established. I can't see anything there at the minute. Also, at least half of the article is a copyvio of their corporate spiel, seen in this job posting. --kateshortforbob 09:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per good arguments above. Jakew 10:15, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Tough choice here, I know that significant work would need to be done including the sources to prove notability, but the company looks just significant enough to pass notability guidelines, but by a hair.--JForget 23:12, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete on grounds of WP:NOSPAM. I love the peacock language: "Carter & Burgess’ core expertise resides in every major industry....". Looks like they may have spread themselves a bit thinly when it comes to advertising industry department. --Gavin Collins 12:20, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete What might not be notable in one region, might be in another, still copyvio bothers me Mbisanz 06:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.