Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carter (real estate)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 20:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

Carter (real estate)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This does not appear to be a notable company, either from the references I see in the article or from my own search. Almost all the references are to the company's own web site, and those that are not are either directories or mentions in routine news stories not focusing on the company.

It was previously speedily deleted under G11, as being solely promotional. It's still pretty promotional in tone, but that's not the issue for which I nominate it; my nomination is based on lack of notability. TJRC (talk) 18:21, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:25, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:25, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Masum Reza 📞 20:01, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Entirely self-serving and promotional - fails WP:SPIP. While the article has 49 references, the vast majority are primary sources from the company's website. Of the others, most are based on company announcements or run-of-the-mill inclusions in listings. I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 20:26, 25 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The Wikipedia page should not be deleted. Further digging into research provides a plethora of notable works from around the country, particularly in Atlanta. The initial research the user above did could have been confused because the company has changed its name multiple times. None of the links are self-referential to the company's website anymore. I think the article should remain online. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mimsr (talk • contribs) 19:56, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
 * There are more than 50 references on the article page and not a single one of them meets the criteria for establishing notability. Most fail WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. I encourage you to familiarise yourself with those sections before adding any other references.  HighKing++ 14:36, 30 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.