Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartisan (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 03:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Cartisan
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable Indian startup founded in June 2015, SPA-created article. Sources are PR articles and interviews, where founders and investors praise their own new project. Article fails both WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:ORGIND for lack of in-depth information from independent non-promotional sources. Google search found no better reference possibilities. GermanJoe (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC) GermanJoe (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment (ec) about the last nomination. Per AfD instructions the nomination should have been closed as "No Consensus" at the very least. A few "sources" obviously exist, but the amount of independent coverage in these sources should also be evaluated. Pinging and  as contributors of the last nomination, and  as closer. GermanJoe (talk) 18:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    18:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    18:51, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    18:52, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   16:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete A startup a few months old, for which the only references are that it received startup funding. Given how many startups are not around one or two years later, this one definitely needs more time to mature as it has not yet "made it." WP is not a venue for promotion. LaMona (talk) 19:45, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:28, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:28, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete, per LaMona, and redirect to Cartesian (as a possible misspelling). -- Notecardforfree (talk) 19:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.