Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartoon Network Too (United States)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 01:21, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Cartoon Network Too (United States)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No references, may be a hoax. ViperSnake151 Talk  20:16, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

no —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oddoflyoko (talk • contribs) 20:22, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Delete - Smells like a hoax. At the URL listed for the image, the "Too" logo is not there. I did see the logos for the original Cartoon Network and its HD counterpart. Willking1979 (talk) 20:40, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: I dont really think the image has anything to do with this article specifically; it's also in the original Cartoon Network TOO article and that channel surely is real. Soap Talk/Contributions 20:44, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:V, WP:CRYSTAL. If there actually were a US version of this channel set to launch next month it surely would have attracted some press coverage. Pburka (talk) 21:26, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be either a hoax or wishful thinking. Tried both Google News and Time Warner's press releases and got nothing, and there'd be coverage somewhere out there if this was really launching in June. BryanG (talk) 21:31, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as clear violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Eddie.willers (talk) 22:45, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like a hoax. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 01:29, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Cartoon Network in America already has a second channel - it's called Boomerang. Another in a long line of hoaxy channels.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:25, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete This passes WP:NFT for me, just some kid wishing this was true and making an article about it, out and out hoax. treelo  radda  08:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.