Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cartoons, Lampoons, and Buffoons (radio show)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Cartoons, Lampoons, and Buffoons (radio show)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Previously in Oct. 2008; no consensus.

5 half-hour episodes; no evidence of notability. The existence of other short-lived series that were notable don't prove this series is notable; nor does being broadcast on a notable radio station. StarM 02:15, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  --  StarM  02:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  --  StarM  02:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Films are considered notable when notable individuals have a significant role in their creation. Who worked on this radio show? =- Mgm|(talk) 10:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Response not a clue there's very little that isn't a wiki mirror. Only the "source" cited in the article which provides no info either. There's no evidence whatsoever of notability. StarM  02:14, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party sources. JamesBurns (talk) 03:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks notability, 3rd party sources--Rtphokie (talk) 19:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep With regard to Mgm's comment and StarM's reply... I was able to expand the article to add episodes and episode summary, and was able to source the participation of several notable British journalists and commedians. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelQSchmidt (talk • contribs)
 * Based on the FAQ the epiguides pages seem reasonably reliable, but I'd prefer it if someone dug up the original sources they based their content on to silence any critics. I'm witholding my vote at the moment. - Mgm|(talk) 08:52, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


 * delete no reliable sources to establish notability or to make any of this verifiable.Bali ultimate (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.